When I was in grad school, a professor once asked our class a deceptively simple question:
“How long is too long for you?”
The room paused. Responses trickled in, two weeks, a few days, twenty minutes. Everyone had their own threshold. But the real weight of the question lingered. In a world that rewards speed, who gets to decide how long is too long when it comes to learning something deeply?
For a long time, software engineers were nudged toward breadth. Teams needed generalists, developers who could juggle frontend code in the morning, debug APIs in the afternoon, and deploy infrastructure by evening. Specialization wasn’t discouraged, but it wasn’t exactly feasible either. Time was scarce, priorities moved fast, and the pressure to deliver rarely paused for deep learning.
But things are changing. And not quietly.
Today, the engineers driving meaningful impact are the ones who’ve gone deep, invested the time, patience, and focus to master their domain.
The value of going deep
Just like continuous learning, depth also manifests in better decisions, faster execution, and quieter confidence in technology.
A frontend engineer who knows how the browser processes CSS and JavaScript can unlock performance wins that drastically improve the user experience. A backend developer who understands how database indexes work can restructure a single query and save hours of computation. A DevOps lead who fine-tunes pipelines can cut deployment times from hours to minutes.
These kinds of optimizations don’t happen through surface-level understanding. They come from specialized knowledge, earned over time, sometimes slowly, sometimes through hard-won experience, but always with intent.
Depth amplifies impact. It’s not because someone knows everything, but because they know enough in one area to create change where it matters.
Building depth into your engineering team
Depth isn’t accidental. It requires intention from both the individual and the organization. And while it won’t happen overnight, the process starts with building the right environment.
Here’s how engineering teams can foster deep, meaningful expertise:
Give engineers permission to specialize
For years, engineering roles have been defined by flexibility, like “full-stack,” “jack of all trades,” and “move fast and fix things later.” But when every developer is spread thin across multiple areas, nobody has the time or mental clarity to go deep in any one of them.
That’s why one of the most powerful things a tech lead or manager can do is offer engineers permission to narrow their focus. This doesn’t mean working in isolation. It means owning a domain.
Let engineers claim technical areas that interest them, such as frontend performance, CI/CD infrastructure, database tuning, accessibility, observability, anything that connects with both their curiosity and your team’s roadmap. Then, reinforce that ownership by removing distractions and aligning projects that let them grow.
Specialization becomes a feedback loop: as developers go deeper, they generate more value. As they generate more value, the team supports them with greater autonomy and trust.
It all starts with permission and the encouragement to follow curiosity.
Redefine what it means to be “experienced”
It’s common to use years of experience as a shortcut for skill. But in today’s engineering landscape, depth is measured by what someone can solve, explain, and teach.
Teams that reward real-world impact over résumé bullet points tend to uncover hidden experts, like developers who’ve quietly mastered key systems but haven’t been formally recognized. These are the people who debug production issues faster, propose smarter architectural changes, and save the team time without fanfare.
Instead of asking, “How long have you been working in this area?” ask questions like:
“How do you approach solving performance bottlenecks in this part of the system?”
“What tools have you built or refined to improve delivery?”
“Where have you saved the team time by sharing knowledge or improving processes?”
Experience is contextual. It’s defined by relevance, not tenure. When teams shift their mindset around this, they start promoting based on depth, not just presence.
Invest in structured, focused learning
Depth doesn’t grow from chaotic learning. While curiosity can spark exploration, sustained expertise is built through structure.
Give engineers a clear path to mastery. That might mean formalizing a learning track, dedicating time each sprint for self-guided study, or partnering with a platform that helps engineers build technical depth aligned to their goals.
Random tutorials and scattered YouTube videos won’t build a deeply knowledgeable developer. What works is:
Choosing a focus area and sticking with it
Learning through guided progression—beginner to advanced
Applying skills through hands-on practice and team projects
Receiving feedback from peers or mentors
This is exactly what DevPath Skill Paths are designed for: deep, role-relevant technical learning, without the fluff.
By investing in structured learning, you replace guesswork with clarity, and engineers begin to see progress not just in knowledge but also in confidence and output.
Normalize knowledge sharing as a leadership behavior
Depth that isn’t shared doesn’t scale. A single developer with deep knowledge is valuable, but a team where that knowledge multiplies is transformative.
Make it a cultural norm for engineers to share what they’re learning, whether through internal documentation, brown-bag sessions, post-mortems, or pair programming. When learning is socialized, it becomes sticky, as it reinforces lessons, exposes gaps, and builds collective momentum.
More importantly, it creates internal mentors. Engineers who teach are engineers who grow, and the teams that learn from them improve faster, break fewer things, and ship with more confidence.
Support knowledge sharing with time, recognition, and opportunities. Create slack in the system so engineers don’t feel like they have to choose between “doing” and “sharing.” Encourage storytelling, not just specs, because context builds wisdom, not just knowledge.
Protecting depth as your team grows
Building depth is one challenge, but preserving it through scale is another.
As teams expand, projects grow more complex, and delivery pressures mount, the natural tendency is to revert to speed over strategy. Teams start asking engineers to stretch again, picking up unfamiliar work “just for now,” putting off deep work for more “urgent” needs. Before long, that hard-earned expertise starts to erode, buried under short-term priorities and reactive planning.
This is where leadership needs to play defense.
Protecting depth means defending the time and space required for focused work. It means resisting the urge to over-distribute experts across too many initiatives and instead allowing them to stay close to the systems they’ve mastered. It means not hoarding knowledge but continuing to refining it, applying it, and mentoring others from a position of clarity.
It also means making depth visible.
Recognize domain experts in team rituals. Invite them into design conversations early, not just for validation but for insight. Use their feedback loops to steer future technical decisions and empower them to shape the standards and processes around their area of focus.
Why now is the time to go deep
Engineering isn’t slowing down. If anything, the pace of change is accelerating. But not everything should move at top speed. The teams who make the most meaningful progress are often the ones who understand when to slow down to learn, to master, and to build with intention.
Going deep is about anchoring yourself within it.
When engineers build depth, they create leverage. A single optimization becomes a team-wide benefit. A resolved bottleneck becomes a pattern for better systems. A well-designed feature saves hundreds of hours later.
And the longer-term effect? Resilience. Autonomy. The ability to lead, not just follow.
Invest in mastery—it’s never “too long”
There is no set timeline for mastery. What matters more is the commitment to start and the support to stay the course.
At DevPath, we believe that depth is the path forward for developers, teams, and engineering orgs that want to build lasting things.
So if you’re asking yourself where to go next, consider asking something different:
Where should I go deeper?
It’s all about how far it’ll take you, not how long it takes you.
Free Resources
